Contact info
  • Write:

    bearmcblack@mail.com

  • Visit:

    bedford, Bedfordshire, UK

Send request

Leave your number,
and we'll call you back

image
Case Study

Asset-Led Turnaround

Case Type Tag: Turnaround | Commercial Strategy | Retention

Reversed a two-year churn trend in a distressed portfolio by pivoting from "Service Frequency" to "Infrastructure Assets.

34 %
Retention Uplift

Asset-Led Value Engineering

I inherited 42 strategic accounts that were over-serviced but under-capacitated. Clients were price-sensitive and looking to leave. I rejected the standard "price drop" defense. Instead, I executed an Operational Pivot: transitioning high-volume clients from standard "Wheelie Bins" (High Frequency / High Cost) to on-site Static Compactors (Low Frequency / High Capacity). This wasn't just a sale; it was an infrastructure upgrade that lowered the client's daily OPEX while locking in long-term asset rental revenue for Biffa.

  • Client:

    Biffa Waste Services (FTSE 250)

  • Client Snapshot:

    The UK’s leading integrated waste management company. South Midlands Region.

  • The Landscape:

    A distressed portfolio of 42 Key Accounts. The region had the highest churn rate in the company. Clients were fatigued by service failures and price hikes.

Constraints & Risks:
  • Churn: Clients were already tendering for new suppliers.
  • Internal Culture: Sales teams were incentivized to sell "lifts" (truck visits), not assets.
  • CAPEX: Required convincing the board to invest capital in machinery for "at-risk" clients.
Key Stakeholders:

Regional Director, Depot Managers, Client Finance Directors.

The Core Challenge / Problem Statement:
  • Service Failure:

    High frequency meant more chances for missed collections.

  • Cost Sensitivity:

    Clients felt they were paying too much for poor service.

  • Margin Erosion:

    Driving trucks daily is expensive (fuel/driver time).

Role & Scope:

Business Improvement Manager. Turnaround mandate for the South Midlands Area.

The Strategy:

"Asset-Led Restructuring." Reduce the number of "touchpoints" (collections) to reduce the risk of failure. Move revenue from "Service" (Variable) to "Asset Rental" (Fixed).

Solution Overview:
  • The Audit:

    Identified clients generating enough volume to justify static machinery.

  • The Pivot:

    Replaced 20+ wheelie bins per site with 1 Static Compactor.

  • The Deal:

     Lowered the client's annual bill (fewer collections) but increased Biffa's margin (machinery rental + long-term contract lock-in).

The Commercial Win:

Stabilised the portfolio. Clients signed 3-5 year extensions because they invested in the infrastructure.

3 Key Results:
  • 34% Uplift in client retention (Highest in Region).

  • Margin Expansion: Increased net profitability per account despite lowering topline cost for the client.

  • Traffic Reduction: Reduced collection vehicle movements by up to 60%.

Data Snapshot:
  • Retention Rate: Reversed from -15% trend to +34% positive.
  • Contract Length: Extended average tenure from <1 year to 3+ years.
Why It Matters:

Proves that Capital Assets create "stickiness." It is harder to fire a supplier who owns the machine attached to your building.

Bear’s Signature Contribution:
  • Decision:

    Challenging the internal sales dogma of "sell more lifts."

  • Execution:

    Managing the civil engineering and installation of heavy machinery.

  • Insight:

    Realising that "Less Service" (fewer collections) was actually "Better Service."

Capabilities Demonstrated:
  • Turnaround Management

  • P&L Optimization

  • Asset Management Strategy

  • Client Retention Architecture

Transferable Lessons:
  • Hardware creates Stickiness:

    Software (or service) is easy to churn. Hardware is hard to churn.

  • Aligned Incentives:

    Find a way to charge more profit while the client pays less total cost.

image

Do you have any questions?